A molecular basis for the differential roles of Bubl and BubR1 in the spindle assembly checkpoint

109Citations
Citations of this article
138Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) monitors and promotes kinetochoremicrotubule attachment during mitosis. Bubl and BubRl, SAC components, originated from duplication of an ancestor gene. Subsequent subfunctionalization established subordination: Bubl, recruited first to kinetochores, promotes successive BubRl recruitment. Because both Bubl and BubRl hetero- dimerize with Bub3, a targeting adaptor for phosphorylated kinetochores, the molecular basis for such sub-functionalization is unclear. We demonstrate that Bubl, but not BubRl, enhances binding of Bub3 to phosphorylated kinetochores. Grafting a short motif of Bubl onto BubRl promotes Bubl-independent kinetochore recruitment of BubRl. Such gain-of-function BubRl mutant cannot sustain a functional checkpoint. We demonstrate that kinetochore localization of BubRl relies on direct hetero-dimerization with Bubl at a pseudo-symmetric interface. Such pseudo-symmetric interaction underpins a template-copy relationship crucial for kinetochore-microtubule attachment and SAC signaling. Our results illustrate how gene duplication and sub-functionalization shape the workings of an essential molecular network.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Mps1 and Bub1 are required for kinetochore localization of BubR1. (A) Similar domain organization of the homologous proteins Bub1 and BubR1. TPR—tetratrico peptide repeat, B3BD—Bub3 binding domain, B1—Bub1, BR1—BubR1. (B) Schematic depiction of the outer KT (KMN network). MELT repeats of Knl1 are phosphorylated by the checkpoint kinase Mps1 and recruit Bub1/Bub3 to KTs. It is not clear how BubR1 is recruited to KTs. (C–D) Quantitative IP-mass spectrometry analyses showing that the interaction of Bub1, BubR1, and Bub3 with KTs is significantly reduced upon inhibition of Mps1 with Reversine. Green- and red-labeled hits indicate respectively Figure 1. continued on next page
  • Figure 2. The loop regions of Bub1 and BubR1 modulate the interaction of Bub3 with phosphorylated MELT motifs. (A) Recombinant Bub3, Bub1209–270/Bub3 and BubR1362–431/Bub3 were incubated with immobilized MBP-Knl1MELT1 (residues 138–168 of human Knl1) prephosphorylated with Mps1 (+) or unphosphorylated (−). Empty lanes (−) demonstrate lack of background binding to empty beads. wt, wild type; B3, Bub3; B1, Bub1; BR1, BubR1. (B) Multiple sequence alignments of the Bub3 binding domains (B3BD) of human (Homo sapiens, Hs), chicken (Gallus gallus, gg), frog (Xenopus laevis, Xl), and budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Sc) Bub1 and BubR1s. Mad3 is the budding yeast BubR1 homolog. ScBub1R314 (red asterisk) directly contributes to the interaction with the MELTP peptide. The different Bub1 and BubR1 sequences were aligned manually on the basis of the crystal structures of the B3BDs of Mad3 and Bub1 in complex with Bub3 (Larsen et al., 2007; Primorac et al., 2013). Figure 2. continued on next page
  • Figure 3. Behavior of the ‘loop swap’ mutants in HeLa cells. (A) Representative images of stable Flp-In T-REx cells expressing either GFP-Bub1 wild type (wt) or the loop mutant showing that the BR1-loop impairs KT localization. Scale bar: 10 μm. (B) Quantification of Bub1 KT levels in cells treated as in panel A. The graph shows mean intensity from three independent experiments. Error bar represents SEM. Values for Bub1 wt are set to 1. (C) Representative Figure 3. continued on next page
  • Figure 4. A minimal BubR1-binding region of Bub1. (A and C) Representative images of stable Flp-In T-REx cell lines expressing the indicated GFP-Bub1 constructs after treatment with nocodazole, showing that Bub1209–409 is sufficient to recruit BubR1 (panel A) and that residues 271–409 are essential for this function (panel C). Scale bar: 10 μm. (B and D) Quantification of BubR1 KT levels in cells treated as in panels B and D, respectively. The graphs show mean intensity of two independent experiments, the error bars indicate SEM. The mean value for non-depleted cells expressing GFP (panel B) or GFP-Bub1209–409 (panel D) is set to 1. (E) Western blot of immunoprecipitates (IP) from Figure 4. continued on next page
  • Figure 5. A minimal Bub1-binding region of BubR1. (A and C) Representative images of HeLa cells transfected with the indicated GFP-BubR1 constructs. Cells were treated as described in Figure 3E. BubR1362–571 is the minimal construct that is able to localize to KTs in the presence of Bub1. Scale bar: 10 μm. (B) Quantification of BubR1 KT levels in cells treated as in panels A and C. The graph shows mean intensity of at least two independent experiments, error bars depict SEM. Values for GFP-BubR1 FL in non-depleted cells are set to 1. (D) BubR1362–571 and Bub11–409/Bub3 interact in size exclusion chromatography. (E) BubR1362–431/Bub3 and Bub11–409/Bub3 do not interact in size exclusion chromatography. (F) BubR1432–571 and Bub11–409/Bub3 do not interact in size exclusion chromatography. mAU—milliabsorbance unit. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.05269.013
  • Figure 6. A pseudo-symmetric Bub1–BubR1 interaction. (A) The identified minimal constructs BubR1362–571 and Bub1209–409/Bub3 interact in size exclusion chromatography. (B) Summary of the behavior of the indicated Bub1 and BubR1 constructs. (C and E) Representative images of HeLa cells transfected with the indicated GFP-BubR1 constructs showing that neither BubR1Δ432–484 (panel C), which lacks the predicted helical segment of the C-terminal extension, nor BubR1E409K+E413K (panel E), which is not able to bind Bub3, are able to localize to KTs. Cells were treated as in Figure 3E. For BubR1Δ432–484 two different expression levels are depicted in the non-depleted condition. Scale bar: 10 μm. (D and F) Quantification of BubR1 KT levels in cells treated as in panels C and E, respectively. The graph shows mean intensity from at least two independent experiments. Error bars represent SEM. Values for BubR1FL in non-depleted cells are set to 1. (G) Domain organization of LacI-GFP-Bub1 constructs. (H) LacIBub1wt recruits BubR1 to the Lac-Operator, whereas Bub1E252K, which cannot bind Bub3, does not. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.05269.014 The following figure supplement is available for figure 6:
  • Figure 7. Functional characterization of BubR1 mutants. (A) Mean duration of mitosis of Flp-In T-REx stable cell lines expressing GFP-BubR1 wt or the indicated mutants in the absence of endogenous BubR1 and in the presence of 50 nM nocodazole. Cell morphology was used to measure entry into and exit from mitosis by time-lapse-microscopy (n > 44 per cell line per experiment) from at least three independent experiments. Error bars depict SEM. (B) Western blot of immunoprecipitates (IP) from mitotic Flp-In T-REx cell lines expressing the indicated GFP-BubR1 constructs. Tubulin was used as loading control. (C) Quantification of the Western Blot in Figure 7B. The amounts of co-precipitating proteins were normalized to the amount of GFP-BubR1 bait present in the IP. Values for GFP-BubR1 wt are set to 1. The graphs show mean intensity of two independent experiments. Error bars represent SEM. (D) Analysis of cold-stable microtubules in cells expressing the indicated GFP-BubR1 constructs. (E) Western Blot of immunoprecipitates (IP) from mitotic Flp-In T-REx cell lines expressing the indicated GFP-BubR1 constructs. The asterisk represents an unspecific band recognized by the PP2A antibody. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.05269.016
  • Figure 8. Extension of the template model. (A) Model of the Bub1–BubR1 interaction. The upper part shows the described KT recruitment mechanism of BubR1/ Bub3, which in turn recruits the phosphatase PP2A, to a Bub1/Bub3 complex on Knl1. The lower part depicts a close-up of the identified pseudo-symmetric Bub1–BubR1 interaction, which involves equivalent segments of Bub1 and BubR1 comprising the Bub3 binding domain and a C-terminal extension whose first part is predicted to have a helical fold in both proteins. The presence of Bub3 on both proteins seems to be essential for this interaction, although due to different reasons (for more explanations see text). The TPR regions of human Bub1 and BubR1 bind to non-conserved short motifs of Knl1 named KI1 and KI2, respectively (Kiyomitsu et al., 2007; Krenn et al., 2012, 2014). (B) Extension of the template model. Mad1/C-Mad2 at KTs is known to act as a template for the establishment of the Cdc20/C–Mad2 interaction. This seems similar to the BubR1 recruitment mechanism, wherein Bub1/Bub3 recruits BubR1/Bub3 through a pseudo-symmetric Figure 8. continued on next page

References Powered by Scopus

MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput

35964Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time

1839Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Jpred 3 secondary structure prediction server.

1265Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The Molecular Biology of Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Signaling Dynamics

567Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Aurora B kinase in chromosome bi-orientation and spindle checkpoint signaling

194Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Playing polo during mitosis: PLK1 takes the lead

136Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Overlack, K., Primorac, I., Vleugel, M., Krenn, V., Maffini, S., Hoffmann, I., … Musacchio, A. (2015). A molecular basis for the differential roles of Bubl and BubR1 in the spindle assembly checkpoint. ELife, 2015(4). https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05269

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 61

65%

Researcher 23

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 57

54%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42

40%

Medicine and Dentistry 6

6%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

1%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0