A Multiple Streams Analysis of Institutional Innovation in Forest Watershed Governance

18Citations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Increasingly severe wildfires have focused attention on forested watershed vulnerabilities, causing significant changes to policies and governance. We utilized the Multiple Streams Approach (MSA) to understand institutional innovations of federal agency–large water provider partnerships in Colorado to protect watersheds through joint planning and funding. Ambiguous problem definition and focusing events were significant aspects of these partnerships. We interviewed individuals in the partnerships, with MSA ideas of how solutions to policy problems develop, and the role of policy entrepreneurs. We found that wildfires served as focusing events, creating space and time for learning, collaboration and new problem framing, increased political attention, and institutional innovation. In this study, windows of opportunity stayed open longer, policy entrepreneurs and agencies played larger roles in communication and coupling streams and the context of fast-moving, unpredictable ecological crises changed responses to issues. Our findings also have implications for broader policy studies and environmental governance scholarship.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huber-Stearns, H. R., Schultz, C., & Cheng, A. S. (2019). A Multiple Streams Analysis of Institutional Innovation in Forest Watershed Governance. Review of Policy Research, 36(6), 781–804. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12359

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free