Viewpoint: Peer-reviewed article overcoming obstacles to shared mental health decision making

2Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text
This PDF is freely available from an open access repository. It may not have been peer-reviewed.

Abstract

Shared decision making (SDM) is difficult to implement in mental health practice, but it remains an ethical ideal for motivating therapeutic capacity in patient-clinician relationships; this discrepancy warrants attention from clinical and ethical perspectives. This article explores what some clinicians see as obstacles to even attempting SDM with patients with psychiatric disabilities. In particular, this article identifies 4 such obstacles: A patient's lack of decision-making capacity, a patient's poor insight, a health care professional's therapeutic pessimism or personal dislike, and a patient's or health care professional's conflicting recovery orientations or goals of care. This article argues that each obstacle could be overcome in many cases and that health care professionals, patients, and their caregivers should remain dedicated to attempting SDM in mental health practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guidry-Grimes, L. (2020). Viewpoint: Peer-reviewed article overcoming obstacles to shared mental health decision making. In AMA Journal of Ethics (Vol. 22, pp. E446–E451). American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2020.446

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free