Methodology of comprehensive biodiversity assessment

  • Bentai W
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The six meetings of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity held in 2002 adopted the goal of "significantly reducing the rate of biodiversity loss worldwide by 2010", and requested Parties to develop biodiversity assessment indicators and to conduct biodiversity assessment. This paper puts forward five indicators for comprehensive biodiversity assessment, i.e. species richness, diversity of ecosystem types, completeness of vertical stratification of vegetation, endemism, and extent of biological invasions, based on the principles of scientific approach, representativeness, and practicality. Methods for comprehensive biodiversity assessment were established, and a national biodiversity assessment was conducted by taking 31 provinces (including municipalities and autonomous regions) as the basic assessment units. Biodiversity of provinces was classified into four grades. Yunnan, Sichuan and Guangxi boast highly rich biodiversity. Guizhou, Hubei, Guangdong, Hunan, Chongqing, Fujian, Tibet, Jiangxi, Zhejiang, Hainan, Gansu, Xinjiang, and Shaanxi boast quite high biodiversity. Henan, Anhui, Shandong, Shanxi, Hebei, and Beijing have moderate biodiversity. Jilin, Inner Mongolia, Shanghai, Liaoning, Ningxia, Qinghai, Jiangsu, Heilongjiang, and Tianjin have poor biodiversity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bentai, W. (2007). Methodology of comprehensive biodiversity assessment. Biodiversity Science, 15(1), 97. https://doi.org/10.1360/biodiv.060132

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free