Utility of restage transurethral resection of bladder tumor

7Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) aims at complete resection of all the visible tumors. Existing guidelines recommend restage TURBT in all patients with T1 and high-grade tumors, to avoid under-staging. However, restage TURBT may not be plausible/feasible at all the times. This study was performed with an aim to better define the utility of restage TURBT in a tertiary care hospital of India. Methods: Patients with high grade/T1 tumors at the first TURBT were prospectively enrolled. Their demographic profile, previous cystoscopic findings, and histological reports were recorded. The primary objective was to assess the tumor detection and stage up-migration rates at restage TURBT. The secondary objectives was to identify factors predicting presence of tumor at restage TURBT. Patients were followed up to detect recurrence and progression for a minimum of 3 months. Results: Of 128 prospective patients' enrolled, 29 patients were lost to follow-up and 11 patients did not undergo restage. A total of eighty-eight patients underwent restage TURBT of which twenty-eight patients (31.8%) had tumor at their second TURBT with five of these patients being upstaged to T2. The risk of having a tumor at restage was significantly higher in patients with solid tumors (56.2% vs. 26.4%, P = 0.02, 95% confidence interval: 0.035-0.024) but was independent of the tumor size (P = 0.472), number of growths (P = 0.267), grade of tumor (P = 0.441), presence or absence of muscle at the initial TURBT (P = 0.371) and place of initial TURBT (P = 0.289). There was a significant difference in the recurrence and progression rates in patients who had tumor at restage as compared to those who did not (recurrence; 33.3% and 23.8%, P = 0.022, respectively vs. progression; 11.1% and 3.7% respectively, P = 0.07; mean follow-up = 10.8 months). Conclusions: We conclude that restage TURBT is necessary in patients with solid looking tumors and the presence of tumor at restage confers a higher risk of recurrence and progression.

References Powered by Scopus

The value of a second transurethral resection in evaluating patients with bladder tumors

436Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effect of routine repeat transurethral resection for superficial bladder cancer: A long-term observational study

256Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Effect of Repeat Transurethral Resection on Recurrence and Progression Rates in Patients With T1 Tumors of the Bladder Who Received Intravesical Mitomycin: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial

215Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Role of magnetic resonance imaging in tumor staging and follow-up for bladder cancer

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Does repeat transurethral resection of bladder tumor influence the diagnosis and prognosis of T1 bladder cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Metabolomic Signatures of Treatment Response in Bladder Cancer

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Manoharan, V., Mavuduru, R., Kumar, S., Kakkar, N., Devana, S., Bora, G., … Mandal, A. (2018). Utility of restage transurethral resection of bladder tumor. Indian Journal of Urology, 34(4), 273–277. https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_218_17

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2400.511.52

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 3

75%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0