Counterexample driven refinement for abstract interpretation

62Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Abstract interpretation techniques prove properties of programs by computing abstract fixpoints. All such analyses suffer from the possibility of false errors. We present a new counterexample driven refinement technique to reduce false errors in abstract interpretations. Our technique keeps track of the precision losses during forward fixpoint computation, and does a precise backward propagation from the error to either confirm the error as a true error, or identify a refinement so as to avoid the false error. Our technique is quite simple, and is independent of the specific abstract domain used. An implementation of our technique for affine transition systems is able to prove invariants generated by the StInG tool [19] without doing any specialized analysis for linear relations. Thus, we hope that the technique can work for other abstract domains as well. We sketch how our technique can be used to perform shape analysis by simply defining an appropriate widening operator over shape graphs. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gulavani, B. S., & Rajamani, S. K. (2006). Counterexample driven refinement for abstract interpretation. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 3920 LNCS, pp. 474–488). https://doi.org/10.1007/11691372_34

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free