Strategic Uncertainty and Elite Defections in Electoral Autocracies: A Cross-National Analysis

3Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Defections within the ruling elite often endanger authoritarian rule, emboldening opposition groups and paving the way for regime breakdown. Yet, the consequences of elite defections are better understood than their causes. Why do some authoritarian regimes experience more defections to the opposition than others? This paper develops a theory of the origins of elite defection and tests it using a novel dataset based on the political careers of 15,013 legislative deputies and ministers in 12 electoral autocracies. The theory predicts that regime elites defect when there are greater opportunities to capitalize on the discontent of other regime elites and voters. Regimes with weak party mechanisms that are also supported by many factions experience more defections. Finally, defections increase during economic downturns and when the government’s control of mass media declines, which helps potential defectors coordinate with anti-regime voters.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Río, A. del. (2022). Strategic Uncertainty and Elite Defections in Electoral Autocracies: A Cross-National Analysis. Comparative Political Studies, 55(13), 2250–2282. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140221074273

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free