Fickle consent

5Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Why is consent revocable? In other words, why must we respect someone's present dissent at the expense of her past consent? This essay argues against act-based explanations and in favor of a rule-based explanation. A rule prioritizing present consent will serve our interests the best, in light of our interests in having flexibility over our consent and in minimizing the possibility of error in people's judgments about whether we consent. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dougherty, T. (2014). Fickle consent. Philosophical Studies, 167(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-013-0230-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free