Celebrities and screening: A measurable impact on high-grade cervical neoplasia diagnosis from the 'Jade Goody effect' in the UK

32Citations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background:The celebrity Jade Goody's cervical cancer diagnosis was associated with increased UK cervical screening attendance. We wanted to establish if there was an increase in high-grade (HG) cervical neoplasia diagnoses, and if so, what the characteristics of the women with HG disease were.Methods:We analysed prospective data on 3233 consecutive colposcopy referrals in North East London, UK, from 01 April 2005 to 30 June 2010. Characteristics and outcomes of pre- and post-Goody cohorts were compared.Results:Goody's diagnosis was associated with an increased incidence of colposcopy referrals in all subsequent annual quarters (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.3-1.9, P<0.002-P<0.0005) and increased HG disease diagnoses in the fourth quarter 2008/2009 (IRR 1.3, P=0.05) and first quarter 2009/2010 (IRR 1.3, P=0.07). We observed 1.90-fold (CI: 1.06-3.39), 2.06 (CI: 1.13-3.76) and 2.13-fold (CI: 1.07-4.25) respective increases in the odds of HG disease women being screening-naive in the first and second quarter 2009/2010, and the first quarter 2010/2011 (P<0.04, P<0.02 and P<0.04, respectively). There was a 2.23-fold increase in the odds of screening-naive HG disease women being symptomatic post-Goody's diagnosis (P=0.023). The age distributions of the pre- and post-Goody cohorts did not differ in any study group.Conclusion:Continued publicity about celebrities' diagnoses might encourage screening in at-risk populations. © 2013 Cancer Research UK. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Casey, G. M., Morris, B., Burnell, M., Parberry, A., Singh, N., & Rosenthal, A. N. (2013). Celebrities and screening: A measurable impact on high-grade cervical neoplasia diagnosis from the “Jade Goody effect” in the UK. British Journal of Cancer, 109(5), 1192–1197. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.444

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free