Rigid taping versus scapular stabilizing exercises in subacromial impingement syndrome: A protocol for a randomized controlled trial

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: Shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS) is a common problem seen in subjects who perform repetitive overhead activities. Despite favorable therapeutic results obtained when rigid taping (RT) or scapular stabilizing exercises (SSE) were used in SIS treatment, their comparative effectiveness has not been well studied. Aim of the study: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of rigid taping versus scapular stabilization exercises in treating shoulder pain and function in subjects with SIS. Materials and methods: After screening for inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 93 subjects diagnosed with SIS will be included and assigned randomly into three equal groups. The first group will receive a standard exercise program plus scapular rigid taping (RTG), the second group will receive the standard exercises program plus scapular stabilizing exercises (SSEG), the third group (CG) will receive the standard exercises program. Pain intensity and level of shoulder function will be assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS), and shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) respectively. Results: Data regarding pain level and functional status will be collected at baseline, after the intervention program, and at 3 months follow up. Within and between groups comparisons will be conducted. Conclusions: The results of this study will differentiate between the effectiveness of rigid tape versus scapular stabilizing exercises in treating SIS, thereby helping establish a better rehabilitation program for subjects with SIS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dewir, I. M., & Hussein, H. M. (2020). Rigid taping versus scapular stabilizing exercises in subacromial impingement syndrome: A protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Rehabilitacja Medyczna, 24(3), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.6545

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free