Logic and reasoning: Do the facts matter?

54Citations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Modern logic is undergoing a cognitive turn, side-stepping Frege's 'antipsychologism'. Collaborations between logicians and colleagues in more empirical fields are growing, especially in research on reasoning and information update by intelligent agents. We place this border-crossing research in the context of long-standing contacts between logic and empirical facts, since pure normativity has never been a plausible stance. We also discuss what the fall of Frege's Wall means for a new agenda of logic as a theory of rational agency, and what might then be a viable understanding of 'psychologism' as a friend rather than an enemy of logical theory. © 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Benthem, J. (2008). Logic and reasoning: Do the facts matter? Studia Logica, 88(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-008-9101-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free