Six myths on the virial theorem for interstellar clouds

111Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The interstellar medium is highly dynamic and turbulent. However, little or no attention has been paid in the literature to the implications that this fact has on the validity of at least six common assumptions on the virial theorem (VT), which are as follows. (i) The only role of turbulent motions within a cloud is to provide support against collapse; (ii) the surface terms are negligible compared to the volumetric ones; (iii) the gravitational term is a binding source for the clouds since it can be approximated by the gravitational energy; (iv) the sign of the second time-derivative of the moment of inertia determines whether the cloud is contracting (Ï < 0) or expanding (Ï > 0); (v) interstellar clouds are in virial equilibrium (VE) and (vi) Larson's relations (mean density-size and velocity dispersion-size) are the observational proof that clouds are in VE. However, turbulent, supersonic interstellar clouds cannot fulfil these assumptions because turbulent fragmentation will induce flux of mass, moment and energy between the clouds and their environment, and will favour local collapse while it may also disrupt the clouds within a dynamical time-scale. It is argued that although the observational and numerical evidence suggests that interstellar clouds are not in VE, the so-called 'virial mass' estimations, which should actually be called 'energy-equipartition mass' estimations, are good order of magnitude estimations of the actual mass of the clouds just because observational surveys will tend to detect interstellar clouds appearing to be close to energy equipartition. Similarly, order of magnitude estimations of the energy content of the clouds is reasonable. However, since clouds are actually out of VE, as suggested by asymmetrical line profiles, they should be transient entities. These results are compatible with observationally based estimations for rapid star formation, and call into question the models for the star formation efficiency based on clouds being in VE. © 2006 RAS.

References Powered by Scopus

Turbulence and star formation in molecular clouds

0
2005Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The milky way in molecular clouds: A new complete CO survey

1772Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Control of star formation by supersonic turbulence

1364Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Theory of star formation

1928Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The CO-to-H<inf>2</inf> conversion factor

1683Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Molecular cloud evolution. II. From cloud formation to the early stages of star formation in decaying conditions

285Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ballesteros-Paredes, J. (2006). Six myths on the virial theorem for interstellar clouds. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 372(1), 443–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10880.x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 22

46%

Researcher 14

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 11

23%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Physics and Astronomy 48

98%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 1

2%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free