Differences in pathogen resistance between diploid and polyploid plants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Polyploidy, the state of having more than two full sets of chromosomes, has been hypothesized to provide several evolutionary advantages to flowering plants including increased ability to resist pathogens and parasites. However, studies comparing pathogen resistance in conspecific and congeneric diploids and polyploids have produced mixed results. While the supposed relationship between polyploidy and pathogen resistance has been commented on in several narrative reviews, it has never been subjected to a systematic meta-analysis. We examined the effect of polyploidy on pathogen resistance by synthesizing 214 effect sizes from 128 studies. We find that, overall, there is no consistent effect of polyploidy on pathogen resistance. Subgroup analyses suggest that polyploids perform significantly better than diploids only in resisting hemibiotrophic pathogens, and autopolyploids tend show greater resistance than allopolyploids. This is surprising given the fact that polyploids possess extra allele copies of R-gene alleles that provide resistance to biotrophic pathogens, and this pattern may indicate that signaling cascades needed to elicit hypersensitive responses are disrupted by polyploidy. Disruption is supported by the observation that, across all pathogens, autopolyploids show significantly greater resistance compared to diploids, whereas allopolyploids do not. This is corroborated by the observation that synthetic autopolyploids perform significantly better than their allopolyploid and established counterparts. Regarding pathogen type, diploids show greater resistance than polyploids to pathogens that are fungi or nematodes. Analyses of publication bias indicate little to no bias, and analyses of heterogeneity indicate that phylogeny explains almost none of the observed heterogeneity. These results underscore the importance of not only systematic review but also the strong degree to which the effects of polyploidy depend on ecological context.

References Powered by Scopus

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

42663Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis

26894Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis

10692Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Special issue.: The role of whole genome duplication in evolutionary ecology

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparing diploid and triploid apples from a diverse collection

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hagen, E. R., & Mason, C. M. (2024). Differences in pathogen resistance between diploid and polyploid plants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oikos, 2024(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.09908

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

75%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

13%

Researcher 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7

70%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

10%

Environmental Science 1

10%

Linguistics 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free