William Ockham on the Mental Ontology of Scientific Knowledge

3Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

It has long been acknowledged that one of the most original aspects of Ockham’s account of knowledge is his contention that bodies of scientific knowledge are aggregates but without much explanation as to why he holds this view. In this chapter, I argue that a plausible philosophical motivation lies in the inner structure of his mental ontology, namely, in the intellect’s habits, acts, and their objects, which are the true and necessary principles and conclusions of demonstrations. Ockham upholds what I call a “Principle of Object-Act-Habit-Specification,” according to which kinds of habits and their acts are determined by the objects they grasp. This principle entails that if a body of scientific knowledge contains two or more sentences, it can only have aggregate unity. Furthermore, I look at the logical and determinate orders that gather together the sentences of various aggregate bodies of scientific knowledge.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pelletier, J. (2018). William Ockham on the Mental Ontology of Scientific Knowledge. In Historical-Analytical Studies on Nature, Mind and Action (Vol. 7, pp. 285–299). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00235-0_15

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free