Speech and language skills of low-risk preterm and full-term late talkers: The role of child factors and parent input

26Citations
Citations of this article
127Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Among children in the third year of life, late talkers comprise from 9% to 20%. This range seems to increase when addressing preterm children. This study examined video-recorded child spontaneous speech during parent-child book sharing as well as linguistic skills reported through the MacArthur Bates Communicative Development Inventories (MB-CDI) Short Form in 61 late talkers aged 30 months old (26 low-risk preterm, 8 females; 35 full-term, 12 females). Differences between low-risk preterm and full-term late talkers in child language measures and parental speech input were tested, as were the roles of child and parent factors on child language. Low-risk preterm and full-term late talkers showed similar speech and language skills. Similarly, no differences were found in measures of parental speech between groups. Child cognitive score, chronological age, and low-risk preterm status were positively associated with lexical diversity, rate, and composition of child speech production, whereas family history for language and/or learning disorders as well as parent measures of lexical diversity, rate, and grammatical complexity were negatively associated with the above child variables. In addition, child cognitive score and low-risk preterm status were positively associated with the MB-CDI measures of word and sentence production. Findings are discussed in terms of the need of good practices when following up on low-risk preterm children and of interventions targeting parents input to preterm and full-term late talkers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Suttora, C., Guarini, A., Zuccarini, M., Aceti, A., Corvaglia, L., & Sansavini, A. (2020). Speech and language skills of low-risk preterm and full-term late talkers: The role of child factors and parent input. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(20), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207684

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free