Impact of Manifolding on Performance of a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Stack

  • Nishida R
  • Beale S
  • Pharoah J
8Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Most analyses of fuel cell stacks consider either transport or electrochemical phenomena, but neglect the coupling between the two. An original mathematical model was developed to solve the transport equations coupled with heterogeneous electrochemical reactions for large stacks with internal/external manifolds. The code was used to determine the effect of utilization on electrochemical performance and temperature distribution. The results are presented in terms of fluid flow, pressure, temperature, voltage, and current density distributions. The discussion highlights the importance of manifold design on performance and thermal management.

References Powered by Scopus

Evaluation and modeling of performance of anode-supported solid oxide fuel cell

342Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Three-dimensional thermo-fluid electrochemical modeling of planar SOFC stacks

333Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pressure and flow distribution in internal gas manifolds of a fuel-cell stack

145Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Analyzing different planar biogas-fueled SOFC stack designs and their effects on the flow uniformity

41Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Optimization of manifold design for 1 kW-class flat-tubular solid oxide fuel cell stack operating on reformed natural gas

35Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mass and current uniformity for planar solid oxide fuel cells with discrete landing structured flow fields: A three-dimensional numerical analysis

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nishida, R., Beale, S., & Pharoah, J. G. (2013). Impact of Manifolding on Performance of a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Stack. ECS Transactions, 57(1), 2495–2504. https://doi.org/10.1149/05701.2495ecst

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

25%

Researcher 2

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 6

67%

Energy 2

22%

Chemical Engineering 1

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 395

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free