Overdrive atrial pacing does not improve obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome

82Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the ability of overdrive atrial pacing to reduce sleep apnoea severity. A total of 17 unselected patients (12 males; mean ± SD age 71 ± 10 yrs; body mass index 27 ± 3 kg·m-2) who had received permanent atrial-synchronous ventricular pacemakers for symptomatic bradyarrhythmias and not known to have central or obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) were studied. Using a crossover study design, patients were or were not in pacing mode with atrial overdrive (15 beats·min-1 faster than mean baseline nocturnal cardiac frequency) for 1 month. Patients were paced only during sleep periods, identified by a specific algorithm included in the pacemaker. Patients underwent three overnight polysomnographic evaluations 1 month apart. The first was performed for baseline evaluation. The patients were then randomly assigned to either 1 night in spontaneous rhythm or to 1 night in pacing mode with atrial overdrive. Two patients refused to continue the study after the first polysomnographic evaluation. OSAS was highly prevalent in this population: 10 of the 15 (67%) patients exhibited an apnoea-hypopnoea index of >30 events·h-1. The nocturnal spontaneous rhythm was 59 ± 7 beats·min-1 at baseline, compared to 75 ± 10 beats·min-1 with atrial overdrive pacing. The apnoea-hypopnoea index was 46 ± 29 events·h-1 in spontaneous rhythm, compared to 50 ± 24 events·h-1 with atrial overdrive pacing. Overdrive pacing changed none of the respiratory indices, or sleep fragmentation or sleep structure parameters. In conclusion, atrial overdrive pacing has no significant effect on obstructive sleep apnoea. Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 2005.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pépin, J. L., Defaye, P., Garrigue, S., Poezevara, Y., & Lévy, P. (2005). Overdrive atrial pacing does not improve obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. European Respiratory Journal, 25(2), 343–347. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.05.00132703

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free