Reconsidering the communicative space: Learning to be

2Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this chapter, we ask the reader to set aside existing perceptions of mentoring, supervision and their relatedness to professional experience and instead join us in a sharply reconsidered analysis of the communicative space in which teachers and preservice teachers negotiate the phenomenon of 'learning to be'. We take the Habermasian concept of communicative space (Habermas J, Theory of communicative action, vol 2: Lifeworld and system: a critique of functionalist reason (trans: McCarthy T). Beacon, Boston, 1987) and earlier notions of lifeworld (Heidegger M, Being and time (trans: Macquarrie J, Robinson E). SCM Press, New York, 1962/1927; Merleau-Ponty M, Phenomenology of perception (trans: Smith C). Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1962/1945; Sandberg J, Dall'Alba G, Organ Stud 30:1349-1368, 2009) as a theoretical frame to foreground learning and practice as 'ways of being in the world'. A series of three vignettes are presented to illustrate how mentoring is both epistemological (what we know or can do) and ontological (how we are learning to be). It is this learning to be, in the teaching and learning to teach relationship, that we aim to identify, illustrate and elaborate in this chapter.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

O’Brien, M., Wade-Leeuwen, B., Hadley, F., Andrews, R., Kelly, N., & Kickbusch, S. (2017). Reconsidering the communicative space: Learning to be. In Educating Future Teachers: Innovative Perspectives in Professional Experience (pp. 105–121). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5484-6_7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free