Exactly, what do you mean?

4Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore the boundaries of a subset of the evaluative uses of language: offensive speech. More in particular, our goal is twofold. Firstly, we want to chart the relationship between context and evaluative utterances, as it stands in the current literature. Secondly, we focus on the experimental study of a particular interaction between contextual information and our evaluative claims -when the context is able to turn a seemingly descriptive utterance into an evaluative one. For this second purpose, we argue, certain recent positive proposals, in spite of their merit, come a bit short.

References Powered by Scopus

Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes

7579Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The spreading of misinformation online

1478Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Tweeting From Left to Right: Is Online Political Communication More Than an Echo Chamber?

1064Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Retraction in public settings

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The rise of polarization: Affects, politics, and philosophy

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Sinophobia Analysis of Hate and Offensive Speeches against the Chinese Collective on Twitter: From Implicit to Explicit Cultural Rejection

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Almagro, M., & Villanueva, N. (2021). Exactly, what do you mean? Daimon, (84), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.6018/DAIMON.482231

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Philosophy 1

50%

Arts and Humanities 1

50%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free