Carceral humanitarianism: Logics of refugee detention

  • Tyson S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

"Coopted by military operations, humanitarianism has never been neutral. Rather than welcoming refugees, host countries assess the relative risks of taking them in versus turning them away, using a risk-benefit analysis that often reduces refugees to collateral damage in proxy wars fought in the war on terrorism. Carceral Humanitarianism testifies that humanitarian aid and human rights discourse are always political and partisan"--Publisher's description. Introduction : from political right to humanitarian charity -- "Rescue politics" -- Impossible testimony -- Humanitarian warfare and humanitarian aid : two sides of the same sovereign -- The Christian roots of state sovereignty -- A brief history of humanitarianism -- Contemporary humanitarian space -- Human rights discourse as alibi for humanitarian war -- Collateral damage and the lesser of evils -- Rethinking the "worst" -- A new form of genocide -- Humanitarian aid as poison and cure -- Conclusion : toward hospitality as earth ethics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tyson, S. (2019). Carceral humanitarianism: Logics of refugee detention. Contemporary Political Theory, 18(S2), 83–86. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-017-0178-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free