Randomised controlled trials evaluating artificial intelligence in clinical practice: a scoping review

0Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This scoping review of randomised controlled trials on artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical practice reveals an expanding interest in AI across clinical specialties and locations. The USA and China are leading in the number of trials, with a focus on deep learning systems for medical imaging, particularly in gastroenterology and radiology. A majority of trials (70 [81%] of 86) report positive primary endpoints, primarily related to diagnostic yield or performance; however, the predominance of single-centre trials, little demographic reporting, and varying reports of operational efficiency raise concerns about the generalisability and practicality of these results. Despite the promising outcomes, considering the likelihood of publication bias and the need for more comprehensive research including multicentre trials, diverse outcome measures, and improved reporting standards is crucial. Future AI trials should prioritise patient-relevant outcomes to fully understand AI's true effects and limitations in health care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Han, R., Acosta, J. N., Shakeri, Z., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Topol, E. J., & Rajpurkar, P. (2024, May 1). Randomised controlled trials evaluating artificial intelligence in clinical practice: a scoping review. The Lancet Digital Health. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00047-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free