Rate of injection through Whitacre needles affects distribution of spinal anaesthesia

14Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A prospective, randomized, double-blind study was performed to investigate whether altering the rate of injection of local anaesthetic through a Whitacre needle had any effect on the spinal block achieved. Twenty patients scheduled for elective urological surgery under spinal anaesthesia received an injection of 3 ml of 0.5% plain bupivacaine either by hand (fast) over 10 s (18 ml min-1) or by infusion pump (slow) over 3 min (1 ml min-1). All patients were in the sitting position both during insertion of the spinal needle and for 3 min after the start of spinal injection, and they then changed to the supine position. The slow injection group achieved peak sensory block earlier, after a median interval of 20 (95% confidence interval 12.5-30) min vs 30 (22.5-45) min (P<0.05) for the fast group. The level of peak sensory block was similar: T3.5 (T2-T4.5) vs T4 (T1.5-T6.5). The time to lowest mean arterial pressure occurred earlier in the slow group, at 10 (8 to 18) vs 20 (15-31) min (P<0.05). Duration of the motor block was shorter in the slow group: 180 (152-242) vs 270 (225-300). We conclude that a slow spinal injection of plain bupivacaine results in a block of more rapid onset and recovery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Anderson, L., Walker, J., Brydon, C., & Serpell, M. G. (2001). Rate of injection through Whitacre needles affects distribution of spinal anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 86(2), 245–248. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/86.2.245

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free