Rate of injection through Whitacre needles affects distribution of spinal anaesthesia

14Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A prospective, randomized, double-blind study was performed to investigate whether altering the rate of injection of local anaesthetic through a Whitacre needle had any effect on the spinal block achieved. Twenty patients scheduled for elective urological surgery under spinal anaesthesia received an injection of 3 ml of 0.5% plain bupivacaine either by hand (fast) over 10 s (18 ml min-1) or by infusion pump (slow) over 3 min (1 ml min-1). All patients were in the sitting position both during insertion of the spinal needle and for 3 min after the start of spinal injection, and they then changed to the supine position. The slow injection group achieved peak sensory block earlier, after a median interval of 20 (95% confidence interval 12.5-30) min vs 30 (22.5-45) min (P<0.05) for the fast group. The level of peak sensory block was similar: T3.5 (T2-T4.5) vs T4 (T1.5-T6.5). The time to lowest mean arterial pressure occurred earlier in the slow group, at 10 (8 to 18) vs 20 (15-31) min (P<0.05). Duration of the motor block was shorter in the slow group: 180 (152-242) vs 270 (225-300). We conclude that a slow spinal injection of plain bupivacaine results in a block of more rapid onset and recovery.

Figures

References Powered by Scopus

Distribution of local anesthetic solutions within the subarachnoid space

337Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Density, specific gravity, and baricity of spinal anesthetic solutions at body temperature

70Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effect of glucose concentration on the intrathecal spread of 0.5% bupivacaine

63Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Intrathecal drug spread

247Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Small dose spinal bupivacaine for Cesarean delivery does not reduce hypotension but accelerates motor recovery

39Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Solving the problem of spinal-induced hypotension in obstetric anesthesia

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Anderson, L., Walker, J., Brydon, C., & Serpell, M. G. (2001). Rate of injection through Whitacre needles affects distribution of spinal anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 86(2), 245–248. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/86.2.245

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

55%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

25%

Researcher 3

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 24

89%

Computer Science 1

4%

Social Sciences 1

4%

Engineering 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0