Small representations of big kidney exchange graphs

0Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Kidney exchanges are organized markets where patients swap willing but incompatible donors. In the last decade, kidney exchanges grew from small and regional to large and national-and soon, international. This growth results in more lives saved, but exacerbates the empirical hardness of the NP-complete problem of optimally matching patients to donors. State-of-the-art matching engines use integer programming techniques to clear fielded kidney exchanges, but these methods must be tailored to specific models and objective functions, and may fail to scale to larger exchanges. In this paper, we observe that if the kidney exchange compatibility graph can be encoded by a constant number of patient and donor attributes, the clearing problem is solvable in polynomial time. We give necessary and sufficient conditions for losslessly shrinking the representation of an arbitrary compatibility graph. Then, using real compatibility graphs from the UNOS US-wide kidney exchange, we show how many attributes are needed to encode real graphs. The experiments show that, indeed, small numbers of attributes suffice.

References Powered by Scopus

An algorithmic framework for convex mixed integer nonlinear programs

623Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Kidney exchange

568Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A nonsimultaneous, extended, altruistic-donor chain

266Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dickerson, J. P., Kazachkov, A. M., Procaccia, A., & Sandholm, T. (2017). Small representations of big kidney exchange graphs. In AAAI Workshop - Technical Report (Vol. WS-17-01-WS-17-15, pp. 5–12). AI Access Foundation. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10593

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

82%

Researcher 3

18%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 13

72%

Engineering 2

11%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

11%

Decision Sciences 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free