U-shaped relationship of age at diagnosis and cancer-specific mortality in primary urachal adenocarcinoma: A cohort study

4Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: To examine the association between age at diagnosis and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in primary urachal adenocarcinoma. Methods: The data was obtained from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (SEER). A total of 393 patients were included in the study. Smooth curve fitting and two-piecewise Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify the nonlinearity between the age at initial diagnosis and cancer-specific survival rate. Survival time between different groups was compared using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and the log-rank test. Results: Using smooth curve fitting we found that the relationship between age at diagnosis and cancer-specific survival takes on a U-shaped curve. The inflection point that we identified for the age at initial diagnosis was 60 years. The log-likelihood ratio test (P<0.05) indicated that the two-piecewise Cox regression model was more appropriate for fitting the correlation of age at diagnosis and CSM. The two-piecewise Cox regression model showed that when the age was <60 years, reduced risk of CSM was significantly associated with increased age (HR: 0.95, P=0.0002). Conversely, when age was >60 years, increased risk of CSM was significantly associated with increased age (HR: 1.05, P=0.0499). Conclusions: In summary, our study suggested that the relationship between age at diagnosis and cancer-specific survival is nonlinear, and takes on a U-shaped curve. Both younger and older age at initial diagnosis age were associated with increased CSM.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yu, D. D., Dong, H., Wu, Z. G., Xiao, Y. B., Zhou, C. F., Wang, Q. Q., & Cai, J. (2020). U-shaped relationship of age at diagnosis and cancer-specific mortality in primary urachal adenocarcinoma: A cohort study. Translational Andrology and Urology, 9(3), 1073–1081. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-19-863

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free