Measurement of tagging behavior differences

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper presents the result of a practical study comparing how domain expertise readers tag documents with different descriptions. We conducted an experiment comparing tagging behavior of experts and novices groups and intended to discover which group would generate more reliable and more representative sets of tags when they were asked to provide tags for document bookmarks in a Mozilla Firefox browser. In this analysis, we defined two measures, similarity and relevance, to describe the differences between the two groups. Result from this experiment showed that tags chosen by experts yielded better similarity and relevance in both analyses. Tags chosen by the expert group had higher commonality in pairwise similarity analysis; further, the relevance analysis showed that tags chosen by experts reflected better understanding of the content. Tagging behavior has become highly popular on the web; implications on the design of future social information system are discussed. © 2011 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tsai, L. C., Hwang, S. L., & Tang, K. H. (2011). Measurement of tagging behavior differences. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 6778 LNCS, pp. 373–377). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21796-8_40

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free