INFOMATAS multi-center systematic review and meta-analysis individual patient data of dynamic cerebral autoregulation in ischemic stroke

12Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Rationale: Disturbances in dynamic cerebral autoregulation after ischemic stroke may have important implications for prognosis. Recent meta-analyses have been hampered by heterogeneity and small samples. Aim and/or hypothesis: The aim of study is to undertake an individual patient data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) of dynamic cerebral autoregulation changes post-ischemic stroke and to determine a predictive model for outcome in ischemic stroke using information combined from dynamic cerebral autoregulation, clinical history, and neuroimaging. Sample size estimates: To detect a change of 2% between categories in modified Rankin scale requires a sample size of ∼1500 patients with moderate to severe stroke, and a change of 1 in autoregulation index requires a sample size of 45 healthy individuals (powered at 80%, α = 0.05). Pooled estimates of mean and standard deviation derived from this study will be used to inform sample size calculations for adequately powered future dynamic cerebral autoregulation studies in ischemic stroke. Methods and design: This is an IPD-MA as part of an international, multi-center collaboration (INFOMATAS) with three phases. Firstly, univariate analyses will be constructed for primary (modified Rankin scale) and secondary outcomes, with key co-variates and dynamic cerebral autoregulation parameters. Participants clustering from within studies will be accounted for with random effects. Secondly, dynamic cerebral autoregulation variables will be validated for diagnostic and prognostic accuracy in ischemic stroke using summary receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Finally, the prognostic accuracy will be determined for four different models combining clinical history, neuroimaging, and dynamic cerebral autoregulation parameters. Study outcome(s): The outcomes for this study are to determine the relationship between clinical outcome, dynamic cerebral autoregulation changes, and baseline patient demographics, to determine the diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of dynamic cerebral autoregulation parameters, and to develop a prognostic model using dynamic cerebral autoregulation in ischemic stroke. Discussion: This is the first international collaboration to use IPD-MA to determine prognostic models of dynamic cerebral autoregulation for patients with ischemic stroke.

References Powered by Scopus

Quadas-2: A revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies

10188Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The STROBE guidelines

1997Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data: The PRISMA-IPD statement

1604Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Transfer function analysis of dynamic cerebral autoregulation: A CARNet white paper 2022 update

75Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

New Insights into Cerebrovascular Pathophysiology and Hypertension

71Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Review of studies on dynamic cerebral autoregulation in the acute phase of stroke and the relationship with clinical outcome

45Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beishon, L., Minhas, J. S., Nogueira, R., Castro, P., Budgeon, C., Aries, M., … Panerai, R. B. (2020). INFOMATAS multi-center systematic review and meta-analysis individual patient data of dynamic cerebral autoregulation in ischemic stroke. International Journal of Stroke, 15(7), 807–812. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493020907003

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

63%

Researcher 2

25%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 7

64%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

18%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

9%

Engineering 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free