Choices of Law for Democratic Regional Head Election Dispute Resolution Institutions in Indonesia

1Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This research aimed to provide a conceptual idea regarding legal options in resolving disputes of democratic regional head elections in Indonesia with two proposed options. The first option included revising the Election and Regional Election Law to grant authority to the Constitutional Court (MK) and Election Supervisory Agency (Bawaslu) for adjudicating disputes. The second option proposed implementing the Fifth Amendment to the 1945 Constitution to reconstruct the Constitutional Court as an election court correlating with the primary role of upholding regulations. These proposed options would grant the Constitutional Court the authority to examine and adjudicate substantial matters related to the constitutionality of elections. Furthermore, the analysis used normative legal research including statutory, comparative, and conceptual methods.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Amancik, Ahmad Saifulloh, P. P., Ayub, Z. A., Barus, S. I., & Ramadhani, S. (2024). Choices of Law for Democratic Regional Head Election Dispute Resolution Institutions in Indonesia. Jambura Law Review, 6(2), 304–338. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v6i2.24792

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free