Postoperative Remote Automated Monitoring: Need for and State of the Science

39Citations
Citations of this article
217Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Worldwide, more than 230 million adults have major noncardiac surgery each year. Although surgery can improve quality and duration of life, it can also precipitate major complications. Moreover, a substantial proportion of deaths occur after discharge. Current systems for monitoring patients postoperatively, on surgical wards and after transition to home, are inadequate. On the surgical ward, vital signs evaluation usually occurs only every 4-8 hours. Reduced in-hospital ward monitoring, followed by no vital signs monitoring at home, leads to thousands of cases of undetected/delayed detection of hemodynamic compromise. In this article we review work to date on postoperative remote automated monitoring on surgical wards and strategy for advancing this field. Key considerations for overcoming current barriers to implementing remote automated monitoring in Canada are also presented.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McGillion, M. H., Duceppe, E., Allan, K., Marcucci, M., Yang, S., Johnson, A. P., … Devereaux, P. J. (2018, July 1). Postoperative Remote Automated Monitoring: Need for and State of the Science. Canadian Journal of Cardiology. Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2018.04.021

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free