Absence of cytokine modulation following therapeutic infusion of intravenous immunoglobulin or anti-red blood cell antibodies in a mouse model of immune thrombocytopenic purpura

14Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Human intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and anti-D immunoglobulin preparations are used in the treatment of immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). One mechanism proposed to explain their therapeutic effects in ITP patients is the induction of expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-10 or IL-1ra, leading to a reduction of phagocytic activity of the reticuloendothelial system. However, increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines was also noted following treatment of ITP patients, raising doubt on the actual contribution of anti-inflammatory cytokines in the therapeutic effects of IVIg and anti-D immunoglobulins. The present study evaluated the in vivo modulation of expression of a large array of inflammatory cytokines using a mouse model of thrombocytopenia. IVIg was not found to modulate cytokine expression although it efficiently prevented thrombocytopenia. In contrast, protective (M1/69) and non-protective (TER-119) anti-mouse red blood cell (RBC) antibodies (mimicking anti-D treatment) both increased the expression of CXCL-1 and CXCL-5. Thus, there was no relationship between inflammatory cytokine expression and prevention of thrombocytopenia by IVIg or anti-mouse RBC in the ITP mouse model. These results suggest that the increase in cytokine expression observed in ITP patients following IVIg or anti-D infusion is not required for their therapeutic effects but may rather represent a side-effect of the treatment. © 2007 The Authors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aubin, É., Lemieux, R., & Bazin, R. (2007). Absence of cytokine modulation following therapeutic infusion of intravenous immunoglobulin or anti-red blood cell antibodies in a mouse model of immune thrombocytopenic purpura. British Journal of Haematology, 136(6), 837–843. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2007.06495.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free