Evaluation of reproductive health status among women referring to rural healthcare centers in Neyshabur (Iran) in 2017

  • Khaleghinezhad K
  • Kariman N
  • Nahidi F
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Reproductive health is one of the most important aspects of life. Moreover, rural women constitute the largest demographic in society who are deprived of health services. OBJECTIVE To determine the reproductive health needs of rural women of reproductive age. METHODS This cross-sectional study was conducted on 405 rural women referring to the rural healthcare centers of Neyshabur, Iran, in 2017. The study population was selected through random multistage sampling technique. Data collection was carried out using a standardized questionnaire, evaluating sexual and reproductive health needs. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics in SPSS version 17. RESULTS According to the results, 99.2% and 95.5% of the females received prenatal and postpartum healthcare, respectively. In addition, the rate of cesarean section was 30.25% among the rural women. The contraceptive pill was the most known birth control method (88.9%), whereas coitus interruptus was the most frequently used method (28.5%). Moreover, 59.8% of the rural women married at the age of ≤ 18 years. The most known sexually transmitted disease for these women was HIV/AIDS (81.7%), and just more than half of them had a history of colored vaginal discharge over the past 12 months (56.8%). Furthermore, these women reported 33.1% domestic violence over the past year. CONCLUSION The findings of the present study revealed the urgent need for planning programs to improve the reproductive health of rural women.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khaleghinezhad, K., Kariman, N., Nahidi, F., Ebadi, A., & Nasiri, M. (2018). Evaluation of reproductive health status among women referring to rural healthcare centers in Neyshabur (Iran) in 2017. Electronic Physician, 10(4), 6640–6646. https://doi.org/10.19082/6640

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free