Resilient and Sensitive Key Points of the Photosynthetic Machinery of Coffea spp. to the Single and Superimposed Exposure to Severe Drought and Heat Stresses

46Citations
Citations of this article
69Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study unveils the single and combined drought and heat impacts on the photosynthetic performance of Coffea arabica cv. Icatu and C. canephora cv. Conilon Clone 153 (CL153). Well-watered (WW) potted plants were gradually submitted to severe water deficit (SWD) along 20 days under adequate temperature (25/20°C, day/night), and thereafter exposed to a gradual temperature rise up to 42/30°C, followed by a 14-day water and temperature recovery. Single drought affected all gas exchanges (including Amax) and most fluorescence parameters in both genotypes. However, Icatu maintained Fv/Fm and RuBisCO activity, and reinforced electron transport rates, carrier contents, and proton gradient regulation (PGR5) and chloroplast NADH dehydrogenase-like (NDH) complex proteins abundance. This suggested negligible non-stomatal limitations of photosynthesis that were accompanied by a triggering of protective cyclic electron transport (CEF) involving both photosystems (PSs). These findings contrasted with declines in RuBisCO and PSs activities, and cytochromes (b559, f, b563) contents in CL153. Remarkable heat tolerance in potential photosynthetic functioning was detected in WW plants of both genotypes (up to 37/28°C or 39/30°C), likely associated with CEF in Icatu. Yet, at 42/30°C the tolerance limit was exceeded. Reduced Amax and increased Ci values reflected non-stomatal limitations of photosynthesis, agreeing with impairments in energy capture (F0 rise), PSII photochemical efficiency, and RuBisCO and Ru5PK activities. In contrast to PSs activities and electron carrier contents, enzyme activities were highly heat sensitive. Until 37/28°C, stresses interaction was largely absent, and drought played the major role in constraining photosynthesis functioning. Harsher conditions (SWD, 42/30°C) exacerbated impairments to PSs, enzymes, and electron carriers, but uncontrolled energy dissipation was mitigated by photoprotective mechanisms. Most parameters recovered fully between 4 and 14 days after stress relief in both genotypes, although some aftereffects persisted in SWD plants. Icatu was more drought tolerant, with WW and SWD plants usually showing a faster and/or greater recovery than CL153. Heat affected both genotypes mostly at 42/30°C, especially in SWD and Icatu plants. Overall, photochemical components were highly tolerant to heat and to stress interaction in contrast to enzymes that deserve special attention by breeding programs to increase coffee sustainability in climate change scenarios.

References Powered by Scopus

A Rapid and Sensitive Method for the Quantitation of Microgram Quantities of Protein Utilizing the Principle of Protein-Dye Binding

232860Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sap pressure in vascular plants

3308Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: Regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell

3205Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Plant photosynthesis under heat stress: Effects and management

88Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Shaded-Coffee: A Nature-Based Strategy for Coffee Production Under Climate Change? A Review

59Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Intrinsic non-stomatal resilience to drought of the photosynthetic apparatus in Coffea spp. is strengthened by elevated air [CO<inf>2</inf>]

57Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dubberstein, D., Lidon, F. C., Rodrigues, A. P., Semedo, J. N., Marques, I., Rodrigues, W. P., … Ramalho, J. C. (2020). Resilient and Sensitive Key Points of the Photosynthetic Machinery of Coffea spp. to the Single and Superimposed Exposure to Severe Drought and Heat Stresses. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.01049

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

56%

Researcher 7

26%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

11%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18

72%

Engineering 3

12%

Environmental Science 2

8%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 2

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 11

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0