Efficacy and tolerability of celecoxib in the treatment of acute gouty arthritis: A randomized controlled trial

48Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the analgesic efficacy of high-dose celecoxib in the treatment of moderate to extreme pain and inflammation associated with acute gouty arthritis. Methods. A multinational, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled trial was done with patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with acute gouty monoarthritis or oligoarthritis (onset of pain ≤ 48 h before enrollment). Patients were treated for 8 days with 1 week followup and were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive celecoxib 50 mg bid, celecoxib 400 mg (followed by 200 mg later on Day 1 and then 200 mg bid for 7 days), celecoxib 800 mg (followed by 400 mg later on Day 1 and then 400 mg bid for 7 days), or indomethacin 50 mg tid. Results. Of 443 patients screened, 402 were randomized and 400 received treatment. Baseline demographics were comparable among treatments. Patients receiving high-dose celecoxib (800/400 mg) experienced a significantly greater reduction in pain intensity on Day 2 compared with low-dose celecoxib 50 mg bid [least squares (LS) mean difference -0.46; p = 0.0014]. For high-dose celecoxib 800/400 mg, the change in pain scores from baseline to Day 2 was comparable with indomethacin 50 mg tid (LS mean difference 0.11; p = 0.4331). There were significant differences in adverse events when the combined celecoxib groups (29.5%) were compared with patients taking indomethacin (43.1%; p = 0.0116). There was no change in median serum creatinine levels for any treatment. There were more discontinuations due to adverse events (8.8% vs 3%; p = 0.0147) with indomethacin than with the combined celecoxib groups. Conclusion. High-dose celecoxib (800/400 mg) was significantly more effective than low-dose celecoxib (50 mg bid) and comparable to indomethacin in the treatment of moderate to extreme pain in patients with acute gouty arthritis. Further, celecoxib was well tolerated. The Journal of Rheumatology Copyright © 2012. All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

Gastrointestinal toxicity with Celecoxib vs nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for osteoarthritis and reumatoid arthritis: The CLASS study: A randomized controlled trial

3224Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Preliminary criteria for the classification of the acute arthritis of primary gout

1326Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

EULAR evidence based recommendations for gout. Part II: Management. Report of a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT)

1040Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

2016 updated EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the management of gout

1230Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

2012 American college of rheumatology guidelines for management of gout. part 2: Therapy and antiinflammatory prophylaxis of acute gouty arthritis

657Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

2020 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Management of Gout

603Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schumacher, H. R., Berger, M. F., Li-Yu, J., Perez-Ruiz, F., Burgos-Vargas, R., & Li, C. (2012). Efficacy and tolerability of celecoxib in the treatment of acute gouty arthritis: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Rheumatology, 39(9), 1859–1866. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.110916

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

68%

Researcher 4

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 24

73%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

12%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

9%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 2

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 4

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free