UMCC DLSI: Sentiment Analysis in Twitter using Polirity Lexicons and Tweet Similarity

3Citations
Citations of this article
79Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper describes a system submitted to SemEval-2014 Task 4B: Sentiment Analysis in Twitter, by the team UMCC DLSI Sem integrated by researchers of the University of Matanzas, Cuba and the University of Alicante, Spain. The system adopts a cascade classification process that uses two classifiers, K-NN using the lexical Levenshtein metric and a Dagging model trained over attributes extracted from annotated corpora and sentiment lexicons. Phrases that fit the distance thresholds were automatically classified by the KNN model, the others, were evaluated with the Dagging model. This system achieved over 52.4% of correctly classified instances in the Twitter message-level subtask.

References Powered by Scopus

Crowdsourcing a word-emotion association lexicon

1858Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Alternative k-nearest neighbour rules in supervised pattern recognition. Part 1. k-Nearest neighbour classification by using alternative voting rules

241Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A comparative evaluation of pre-processing techniques and their interactions for twitter sentiment analysis

175Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Second screen user profiling and multi-level smart recommendations in the context of social TVs

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sánchez-Mirabal, P. A., Torres, Y. R., Alvarado, S. H., Gutiérrez, Y., Montoyo, A., & Muñoz, R. (2014). UMCC DLSI: Sentiment Analysis in Twitter using Polirity Lexicons and Tweet Similarity. In 8th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, SemEval 2014 - co-located with the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING 2014, Proceedings (pp. 727–731). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/s14-2130

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 24

67%

Researcher 7

19%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

8%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 30

79%

Linguistics 5

13%

Neuroscience 2

5%

Design 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free