Reimagining a pass/fail clinical core clerkship: a US residency program director survey and meta-analysis

3Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Pass/fail (P/F) grading has emerged as an alternative to tiered clerkship grading. Systematically evaluating existing literature and surveying program directors (PD) perspectives on these consequential changes can guide educators in addressing inequalities in academia and students aiming to improve their residency applications. In our survey, a total of 1578 unique PD responses (63.1%) were obtained across 29 medical specialties. With the changes to United States Medical Licensure Examination (USMLE), responses showed increased importance of core clerkships with the implementation of Step 2CK cutoffs. PDs believed core clerkship performance was a reliable representation of an applicant’s preparedness for residency, particularly in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education’s (ACGME)Medical Knowledge and Patient Care and Procedural Skills. PDs disagreed with P/F core clerkships because it more difficult to objectively compare applicants. No statistically significant differences in responses were found in PD preferential selection when comparing applicants from tiered and P/F core clerkship grading systems. If core clerkships adopted P/F scoring, PDs would further increase emphasis on narrative assessment, sub-internship evaluation, reference letters, academic awards, professional development and medical school prestige. In the meta-analysis, of 6 studies from 2,118 participants, adjusted scaled scores with mean difference from an equal variance model from PDs showed residents from tiered clerkship grading systems overall performance, learning ability, work habits, personal evaluations, residency selection and educational evaluation were not statistically significantly different than from residents from P/F systems. Overall, our dual study suggests that while PDs do not favor P/F core clerkships, PDs do not have a selection preference and do not report a difference in performance between applicants from P/F vs. tiered grading core clerkship systems, thus providing fertile grounds for institutions to examine the feasibility of adopting P/F grading for core clerkships.

References Powered by Scopus

How small differences in assessed clinical performance amplify to large differences in grades and awards: A cascade with serious consequences for students underrepresented in medicine

203Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Impact of pass/fail grading on medical students' well-being and academic outcomes

124Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Variation and imprecision of clerkship grading in U.S. medical schools

89Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

How Internal Medicine Clerkship Directors Are Using Entrustable Professional Activities: A National Survey Study

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Generalizability of consensus regarding standardized letters of evaluation competitiveness: A validity study in a national sample of emergency medicine faculty

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Subtyping of Performance Trajectory During Medical School, Medical Internship, and the First Year of Residency in Training Physicians: A Longitudinal Cohort Study

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, A., Karunungan, K. L., Story, J. D., Shlobin, N. A., Woo, J., Ha, E. L., … Braddock, C. H. (2023). Reimagining a pass/fail clinical core clerkship: a US residency program director survey and meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04770-8

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

57%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

14%

Researcher 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 3

33%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

33%

Social Sciences 2

22%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free