The effect of vascular constriction on umbilical venous pulsation

19Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: Umbilical venous pulsation is an important sign of hemodynamic compromise, but is also found under normal physiological conditions. Mathematical modeling suggests that vascular compliance is a determinant for pulsation, and we tested this by studying velocity pulsation at three sites on the umbilical vein. Methods: In a cross-sectional study of 279 low-risk pregnancies (20-40 weeks' gestational age) blood flow velocity in the umbilical vein was determined before, within and after the umbilical ring in the fetal abdominal wall, and the incidence and magnitude of pulsation (the difference between the maximum and minimum velocity during a pulse, and pulsatility index) were noted. Based on the fact that the vessel cross-sectional area is an important determinant of compliance, we measured the diameter and time-averaged maximum velocity to reflect variation in diameter and compliance at the three sites. Results: The incidence of umbilical venous pulsation was higher at the umbilical ring in the abdominal wall (242/279, 87%, 95% CI 82-90) than m the cord (43/198, 22%, 95% CI 16-27) or intra-abdominally (84/277, 30%, 95% CI 25-36) (P < 0.001). When pulsation was observed intra-abdominally, the pulsatility was not different from that at the umbilical ring (P = 0.16). However, the lowest pulsatility was found in the cord vein (P < 0.0001), where the largest vein diameter was found. Conclusion: The high incidence of venous pulsation at the umbilical ring where diameter and compliance are low supports the suggestion that local compliance is an important factor influencing pulsation in fetal veins. Copyright © 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Skulstad, S. M., Kiserud, T., & Rasmussen, S. (2004). The effect of vascular constriction on umbilical venous pulsation. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 23(2), 126–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.971

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free