Wage increases, transfers, and the socially determined income distribution in the USA

9Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper is based on a social accounting matrix (SAM) which incorporates the size distribution of income based on data from the BEA national accounts, the widely discussed 2012 CBO distribution study, and BLS consumer surveys. Sources and uses of incomes are disaggregated by household groups including the top 1 percent. Their importance (including saving rates) differs markedly across households. The SAM reveals two transfer flows exceeding 10 percent of GDP via fiscal (broadly progressive) and financial (regressive) channels. A third major flow over time has been a ten percentage point increase in the GDP share of the top 1 percent. A simulation model is used to illustrate how ‘feasible’ modifications to tax/transfer programs and increasing low wages cannot offset the historical redistribution toward the well-to-do.

References Powered by Scopus

Do the rich save more?

488Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Homogeneous Middles vs. Heterogeneous Tails, and the End of the 'Inverted-U': It's All About the Share of the Rich

259Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cash flow, investment, and Keynes-Minsky cycles

87Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Economic Growth, Income Distribution, and Climate Change

70Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Historical evolution of global inequality in carbon emissions and footprints versus redistributive scenarios

54Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Macroeconomic inequality from reagan to trump: Market power, wage repression, asset price inflation, and industrial decline

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Taylor, L., Rezai, A., Kumar, R., Barbosa, N., & Carvalho, L. (2017). Wage increases, transfers, and the socially determined income distribution in the USA. Review of Keynesian Economics, 5(2), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2017.02.07

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

50%

Researcher 4

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8

53%

Social Sciences 3

20%

Environmental Science 3

20%

Energy 1

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 23

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free