Ecosystem considerations in Alaska: The value of qualitative assessments

54Citations
Citations of this article
70Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The application of ecosystem considerations, and in particular ecosystem report cards, in federal groundfish fisheries management in Alaska can be described as an ecosystem approach to fisheries management (EAFM). Ecosystem information is provided to managers to establish an ecosystem context within which deliberations of fisheries quota occur. Our goal is to make the case for the need for qualitative ecosystem assessments in EAFM, specifically that qualitative synthesis has advantages worthy to keep a permanent place at the fisheries management table. These advantages include flexibility and speed in responding to and synthesizing new information from a variety of sources. First, we use the development of indicator-based ecosystem report cards as an example of adapting ecosystem information to management needs. Second, we review lessons learned and provide suggestions for best practices for applying EAFM to large and diverse fisheries in multiple marine ecosystems. Adapting ecosystem indicator information to better suit the needs of fisheries managers resulted in succinct report cards that summarize ecosystem trends, complementing more detailed ecosystem information to provide context for EAFM. There were several lessons learned in the process of developing the ecosystem report cards. The selection of indicators for each region was influenced by geography, the extent of scientific knowledge/data, and the particular expertise of the selection teams. Optimizing the opportunity to qualitatively incorporate ecosystem information into management decisions requires a good understanding of the management system in question. We found that frequent dialogue with managers and other stakeholders leads to adaptive products. We believe that there will always be a need for qualitative ecosystem assessment because it allows for rapid incorporation of new ideas and data and unexpected events. As we build modelling and predictive capacity, we will still need qualitative synthesis to capture events outside the bounds of current models and to detect impacts of the unexpected.

References Powered by Scopus

Causes and impacts of the 2014 warm anomaly in the NE Pacific

941Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An index to assess the health and benefits of the global ocean

753Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Integrated ecosystem assessments: Developing the scientific basis for ecosystem-based management of the ocean

566Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Polar Regions

244Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Managing living marine resources in a dynamic environment: The role of seasonal to decadal climate forecasts

179Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Marine Heatwave Stress Test of Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management in the Gulf of Alaska Pacific Cod Fishery

119Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zador, S. G., Holsman, K. K., Aydin, K. Y., & Gaichas, S. K. (2017). Ecosystem considerations in Alaska: The value of qualitative assessments. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 74(1), 421–430. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw144

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 23

51%

Researcher 20

44%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25

63%

Environmental Science 8

20%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 4

10%

Business, Management and Accounting 3

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free