Cytology of the vulva: Feasibility and preliminary results of a new brush

11Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective:Taking a biopsy is a standard procedure to make the correct diagnosis in patients with suspicious premalignant vulvar lesions. The use of a less invasive diagnostic tool as triage instrument to determine whether biopsy is necessary may improve patient comfort especially in patients with chronic vulvar disorders that may warrant consecutive biopsies. This study was conducted to investigate whether vulvar brush cytology is feasible and may be used to detect (pre)malignant vulvar lesions. Methods: A pilot study was performed with patients having clinically normal vulvar skin, lichen sclerosus (LS), usual or differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia or squamous cell carcinoma. A total of 65 smears were taken with the use of a vulvar brush and biopsies were performed for histopathological analysis. Results: Out of 65 smears, 17 (26%) were discarded because of poor cellularity. A total of 28 of 29 (97%) smears with a histological proven (pre)malignancy had a smear classified as suspicious or uncertain. Cytology classified 11 smears as non-suspicious, of which 10 (91%) were indeed normal skin or LS. The accuracy, based on the presence of a lesion, for (pre)malignant lesions with the use of the brush showed a sensitivity of 97% and a negative predictive value of 88%. Conclusion: Vulvar brush cytology is feasible and may be a first step in the development of a triage instrument to determine whether subsequent biopsy of a clinically (pre)malignant lesion is necessary. © 2012 Cancer Research UK All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Den Einden, L. C. G., Grefte, J. M. M., Van Der Avoort, I. A. M., Vedder, J. E. M., Van Kempen, L. C. L. T., Massuger, L. F. A. G., & De Hullu, J. A. (2012). Cytology of the vulva: Feasibility and preliminary results of a new brush. British Journal of Cancer, 106(2), 269–273. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.533

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free