Technological regimes and demand structure in the evolution of the pharmaceutical industry

0Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper examines how the nature of the technological regime governing innovative activities and the structure of demand interact in determining market structure, with specific reference to the pharmaceutical industry. The key question concerns the observation that-despite high degrees of R&D and marketing- intensity-concentration has been consistently low during the whole evolution of the industry. Standard explanations of this phenomenon refer to the random nature of the innovative process, the patterns of imitation, and the fragmented nature of the market into multiple, independent submarkets. We delve deeper into this issue by using an improved version of our previous "history-friendly” model of the evolution of pharmaceuticals. Thus, we explore the way in which changes in the technological regime and/or in the structure of demand may generate or not substantially higher degrees of concentration. The main results are that, while technological regimes remain fundamental determinants of the patterns of innovation, the demand structure plays a crucial role in preventing the emergence of concentration through a partially endogenous process of discovery of new submarkets. However, it is not simply market fragmentation as such that produces this result, but rather the entity of the "prize” that innovators can gain relative to the overall size of the market. Further, the model shows that emerging industry leaders are innovative early entrants in large submarkets.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Garavaglia, C., Malerba, F., Orsenigo, L., & Pezzoni, M. (2013). Technological regimes and demand structure in the evolution of the pharmaceutical industry. In Long Term Economic Development: Demand, Finance, Organization, Policy and Innovation in a Schumpeterian Perspective (pp. 61–94). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35125-9_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free