Validation of 5 key colonoscopy-related data elements from Ontario health administrative databases compared to the clinical record: a cross-sectional study

11Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is used widely, but its quality is highly variable, which may adversely affect patients. Research and quality-improvement initiatives in a variety of jurisdictions have sought to address this issue, often supported by the use of health administrative data. As these data are generally not collected for these purposes, it is critical to measure their validity before use. The aim of this study was to validate health administrative data definitions for 5 key colonoscopy elements through comparison to the clinical record. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, we randomly sampled 1968 colonoscopy and noncolonoscopy procedures performed at 23 hospitals and 5 nonhospital endoscopy clinics between April 2008 and March 2009 in Ontario. We compared definitions for 5 key colonoscopy elements (colonoscopy case, colonoscopy setting, colonoscopy completeness, anesthesiologist assistance and polypectomy) derived from the health administrative data to the clinical record. We calculated weighted and unweighted sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value, adjusted for clustering of patients within physicians, for each definition relative to the reference standard. RESULTS: We abstracted 1845 records; in 1282 cases (69.5%), colonoscopy was intended or performed. The weighted sensitivity and specificity of colonoscopy case, nonhospital colonoscopy setting and anesthesiologist assistance exceeded 95%. The weighted sensitivity for colonoscopy completeness and polypectomy exceeded 95%, but specificity was less than 90%. INTERPRETATION: Ontario health administrative data definitions for 5 key colonoscopy data elements performed well, with sensitivity and specificity values acceptable for use in research and quality-improvement initiatives. In jurisdictions where health administrative data are similarly used for research or quality improvement, similar studies could be considered.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Association between Age and Complications after Outpatient Colonoscopy

30Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Validation of a natural language processing algorithm to identify adenomas and measure adenoma detection rates across a health system: a population-level study

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial of an Endoscopist Audit and Feedback Report for Colonoscopy

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tinmouth, J., Sutradhar, R., Liu, N., Baxter, N. N., Paszat, L., & Rabeneck, L. (2018). Validation of 5 key colonoscopy-related data elements from Ontario health administrative databases compared to the clinical record: a cross-sectional study. CMAJ Open, 6(3), E330–E338. https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20180013

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 3

43%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 6

67%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

11%

Computer Science 1

11%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free