Conclusion

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

As demonstrated in the preceding twelve chapters, this work presents two different approaches to considering uncertainty in constitutional design. First, the subject of constitutional design is engaged. In Chaps. 2 – 4, the authors introduce this project’s theoretical foundation and delineate its intellectual inheritance and development. For the second approach, key propositions drawn from Buchanan and Tullock’s work then are tested in nine independent case studies. So, to this point, the analysis has moved from the abstract level to concrete and specific analysis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Clercy, C. (2015). Conclusion. In Studies in Public Choice (Vol. 32, pp. 239–243). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14953-0_14

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free