Constraint satisfaction parameterized by solution size

5Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In the constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) corresponding to a constraint language (i.e., a set of relations) Γ, the goal is to find an assignment of values to variables so that a given set of constraints specified by relations from Γ is satisfied. In this paper we study the fixed-parameter tractability of constraint satisfaction problems parameterized by the size of the solution in the following sense: one of the possible values, say 0, is "free," and the number of variables allowed to take other, "expensive," values is restricted. A size constraint requires that exactly k variables take nonzero values. We also study a more refined version of this restriction: a global cardinality constraint prescribes how many variables have to be assigned each particular value. We study the parameterized complexity of these types of CSPs where the parameter is the required number k of nonzero variables. As special cases, we can obtain natural and well-studied parameterized problems such as Independent set, Vertex Cover, d -Hitting Set, Biclique, etc. In the case of constraint languages closed under substitution of constants, we give a complete characterization of the fixed-parameter tractable cases of CSPs with size constraints, and we show that all the remaining problems are W[1]-hard. For CSPs with cardinality constraints, we obtain a similar classification, but for some of the problems we are only able to show that they are Biclique-hard. The exact parameterized complexity of the Biclique problem is a notorious open problem, although it is believed to be W[1]-hard. © 2011 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bulatov, A. A., & Marx, D. (2011). Constraint satisfaction parameterized by solution size. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 6755 LNCS, pp. 424–436). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22006-7_36

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free