Inequalities in the prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors in Brazilian slum populations: A cross-sectional study

1Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background Social and environmental risk factors in informal settlements and slums may contribute to increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study assesses the socioeconomic inequalities in CVD risk factors in Brazil comparing slum and non-slum populations. Methods Responses from 94,114 individuals from the 2019 Brazilian National Health Survey were analysed. The United Nations Human Settlements Programme definition of a slum was used to identify slum inhabitants. Six behavioural risk factors, four metabolic risk factors and doctor-diagnosed CVD were analysed using Poisson regression models adjusting for socioeconomic characteristics. Results Compared to urban non-slum inhabitants, slum inhabitants were more likely to: have low (less than five days per week) consumption of fruits (APR: 1.04, 95%CI 1.01–1.07) or vegetables (APR: 1.08, 95%CI 1.05–1.12); drink four or more alcoholic drinks per day (APR: 1.05, 95%CI 1.03–1.06); and be physically active less than 150 minutes per week (APR: 1.03, 95%CI 1.01–1.04). There were no differences in the likelihoods of doctor-diagnosed metabolic risk factors or CVD between the two groups in adjusted models. There was a higher likelihood of behavioural and metabolic risk factors among those with lower education, with lower incomes, and the non-White population. Conclusions Brazilians living in slums are at higher risk of behavioural risk factors for CVD, suggesting local environments might impact access to and uptake of healthy behaviours.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chan, J. J. L., Tran-Nhu, L., Pitcairn, C. F. M., Laverty, A. A., Mrejen, M., Pescarini, J. M., & Hone, T. V. (2022). Inequalities in the prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors in Brazilian slum populations: A cross-sectional study. PLOS Global Public Health, 2(9 September). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000990

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free