Transferability of economic evaluations across jurisdictions: ISPOR good research practices task force report

407Citations
Citations of this article
328Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A growing number of jurisdictions now request economic data in support of their decision-making procedures for the pricing and/or reimbursement of health technologies. Because more jurisdictions request economic data, the burden on study sponsors and researchers increases. There are many reasons why the cost-effectiveness of health technologies might vary from place to place. Therefore, this report of an ISPOR Good Practices Task Force reviews what national guidelines for economic evaluation say about transferability, discusses which elements of data could potentially vary from place to place, and recommends good research practices for dealing with aspects of transferability, including strategies based on the analysis of individual patient data and based on decision-analytic modeling. © 2008, International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Drummond, M., Barbieri, M., Cook, J., Glick, H. A., Lis, J., Malik, F., … Severens, J. (2009). Transferability of economic evaluations across jurisdictions: ISPOR good research practices task force report. Value in Health, 12(4), 409–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00489.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free