Impact of magnification views on the characterization of microcalcifications in digital mammography

9Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the additional benefit of true geometric (air-gap) magnification views for the characterization of microcalcifications in digital mammography. Materials and Methods: After ethical approval, we retrospectively reviewed patient records to identify 100 patients with suspicious microcalcifications (35 malignant, 65 benign) who had a standard digital mammography and an additional digital magnification view in the same projection within three months. All images were obtained using an amorphous silicon-based full-field digital system (Senographe 2000D, GE Healthcare, Chalfont St. Giles, UK). Images were independently analyzed by six board-certified radiologists. The probability of malignancy was estimated using first standard contact mammography alone (MG) and then mammography in combination with the magnification view (MG+MAG) using a modified Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification system and a percentage scale. Results were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. In addition, readers assessed the subjective visibility of the calcifications. Results: For all six readers combined, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.664±0.052 for MG and 0.813±0.042 for MG+MAG, resulting in a statistically significant improvement of 0.148±0.120. Each reader had a higher AUC for MG+MAG than MG, with the improvement being statistically significant in four of the six readers. In 76.34% of the cases, MG+MAG resulted in better visibility of calcifications compared with mammography alone. In 33% slightly more and in 39% significantly more calcifications were found. Conclusion: Even in digital mammography with the option of using electronic magnification (zoom) at the viewing workstation, true geometric (air-gap) magnification views remain important for the visibility and correct classification of microcalcifications and for the assessment of their extent. Citation Format: Fallenberg EM, Dimitrijevic L, Diekmann F etal. Impact of Magnification Views on the Characterization of Microcalcifications in Digital Mammography. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2014; 186: 274-280.© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fallenberg, E. M., Dimitrijevic, L., Diekmann, F., Diekmann, S., Kettritz, U., Poellinger, A., … Renz, D. M. (2014). Impact of magnification views on the characterization of microcalcifications in digital mammography. RoFo Fortschritte Auf Dem Gebiet Der Rontgenstrahlen Und Der Bildgebenden Verfahren, 186(3), 274–280. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1350572

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free