Human cooperation from an economic perspective

12Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Many important economic and social situations are characterized by a conflict of interest between individual and group benefits. The 'tragedy of the commons' (Hardin 1968) is probably one of the best known examples of this problem. Each individual farmer has an incentive to put as many cattle on the common meadow as possible. The tragic consequence may be overgrazing from which all farmers suffer. Collectively, all farmers would be better off if they were able to constrain the number of cattle that simultaneously graze on the commons. Yet, each individual farmer is better off by letting his cattle graze. A similar tension between individual and collective rationality is typical in such diverse areas like warfare, cooperative hunting and foraging, environmental protection, tax compliance, voting, the participation in collective actions like demonstrations and strikes, the voluntary provision of public goods, donations to charities, teamwork, collusion between firms, embargos and consumer boycotts, and so on.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gächter, S., & Herrmann, B. (2006). Human cooperation from an economic perspective. In Cooperation in Primates and Humans: Mechanisms and Evolution (pp. 279–301). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28277-7_15

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free