How economic success shapes redistribution: The role of self-serving beliefs, in-group bias and justice principles

2Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the face of economic inequalities, redistribution of wealth is a key debate for society, and understanding the reasons why individuals may support more or less redistribution can inform this debate. Here we investigate the mechanisms by which experiencing success in a task decreases the support for redistribution of the wealth generated by the task, such that overachievers favor less redistribution than under-achievers. In a laboratory experiment, we replicate this effect and explore how it that may be mediated by an in-group bias, or by changes in individuals’ principles of redis-tributive justice. Critically, both in-group favoritism and self-serving adjustments of justice principles partially accounted for the effect of status on redistribution choices. Our study thus sheds new light on the various ways by which economic experience affects support for redistribution.

References Powered by Scopus

A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation

6790Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments

5531Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method.

1677Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Self-serving bias in redistribution choices: Accounting for beliefs and norms

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Who should benefit from environmental policies? Social preferences and nonmarket values for the distribution of environmental improvements

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dorin, C., Hainguerlot, M., Huber-Yahi, H., Vergnaud, J. C., & de Gardelle, V. (2021). How economic success shapes redistribution: The role of self-serving beliefs, in-group bias and justice principles. Judgment and Decision Making, 16(4), 932–949. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500008032

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

60%

Researcher 2

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 5

50%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3

30%

Decision Sciences 1

10%

Neuroscience 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free