Validation of prediction models in the presence of competing risks: a guide through modern methods

41Citations
Citations of this article
90Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Thorough validation is pivotal for any prediction model before it can be advocated for use in medical practice. For time-to-event outcomes such as breast cancer recurrence, death from other causes is a competing risk. Model performance measures must account for such competing events. In this article, we present a comprehensive yet accessible overview of performance measures for this competing event setting, including the calculation and interpretation of statistical measures for calibration, discrimination, overall prediction error, and clinical usefulness by decision curve analysis. All methods are illustrated for patients with breast cancer, with publicly available data and R code.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Geloven, N., Giardiello, D., Bonneville, E. F., Teece, L., Ramspek, C. L., Van Smeden, M., … Steyerberg, E. (2022). Validation of prediction models in the presence of competing risks: a guide through modern methods. The BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-069249

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free