Long COVID quality of life and healthcare experiences in the UK: a mixed method online survey

4Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: The complexity of long COVID and its diverse symptom profile contributes to unprecedented challenges for patients, clinicians, and healthcare services. The threat of long COVID remains ignored by Governments, the media and public health messaging, and patients’ experiences must be heard through understanding of the lived experience. This study aimed to understand the lived experience of those living with long COVID. Methods: An online web-based survey was designed using Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) to increase understanding of the lived experiences of long COVID, and was distributed through PPIE groups, social media, and word of mouth. The survey used closed and open questions relating to demographics, pre- and post-COVID-19 health quality of life, daily activities and long COVID experiences. Results: Within our sample of 132 people living with long COVID, the findings highlight that individuals are being severely impacted by their symptoms and are unable to or limited in participating in their daily activities, reducing quality of life. Long COVID places strain on relationships, the ability to live life fully and is detrimental to mental health. Varying health care experiences are described by participants, with reports of medical gaslighting and inadequate support received. Conclusions: Long COVID has a severe impact on the ability to live life fully, and strains mental health. The appropriate mechanisms and support services are needed to support those living with long COVID and manage symptoms.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Owen, R., Ashton, R. E., Skipper, L., Phillips, B. E., Yates, J., Thomas, C., … Faghy, M. A. (2024). Long COVID quality of life and healthcare experiences in the UK: a mixed method online survey. Quality of Life Research, 33(1), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-023-03513-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free