Frecuencia y factores asociados a la histerectomía obstétrica en un hospital de segundo nivel en México

1Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION. - Obstetric Hysterectomy (OH) is an emergency procedure to solve a life threatening condition, and its incidence is 5 to 15 per 1000 obstetric events. GENERAL OBJETIVE. - To determine the frequency and factors related with obstetric hysterectomy at a secondary hospital in Mexico. METHODOLOGY. - Descriptive, cross-sectional and retrospective study from January 2014 to December 2016 including all hysterectomy cases due to an obstetric event. Factors such as Age, number of deliveries, abortions, and previous cesarean sections, admission to the Intensive care unit, surgical indications, complications and mortality because of hysterectomy were analyzed thru descriptive statistics. RESULTS. - 37 308 obstetric events were registered and 153 were treated with Obstetric Hysterectomy representing 0.57% of the total, meaning one OH per every 243 pregnancies. The average age of those who had a hysterectomy was 28.5 years, and the procedure had its peak at the group of age older than 35 years who had had two or more pregnancies. The history of previous cesarean section was 39.2%. In 72.1% the pregnancy was terminated with a cesarean section. The main indication for hysterectomy was Uterine Atony in 33.3% (51 cases). The most frequent complication was acute anemia in 83%. There was a maternal death (0.6%). CONCLUSIONS. - Obstetric Hysterectomy is an emergency surgery, there are related factors that must be identified during the prenatal control to avoid this complication.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Genaro Vega, M., Luis Nelson Bautista, G., Lucia Denice Rodríguez, N., Fátima Loredo, A., Jesús Vega, M., Alma Becerril, S., & Silvia Ramos, L. (2017). Frecuencia y factores asociados a la histerectomía obstétrica en un hospital de segundo nivel en México. Revista Chilena de Obstetricia y Ginecologia, 82(4), 408–415. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-75262017000400408

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free